If running a trial involving international patient recruitment, the impact on costs should be carefully considered upfront as international recruitment can entail additional costs beyond that required for recruitment solely of UK patients.. Impact on resources and overall cost will depend on the collaborative model of working chosen, or indeed may drive the decision to which collaborative model is chosen.
Funding
Additional Costs
Making Payments
UK grant funders are now more receptive to funding international recruitment (where required) in clinical trials, however this does vary from funder to funder. It is recommended that funding terms and conditions are fully explored at the outset which may include obtaining an agreement in principal to what can be funded by the funder. Where a funder is receptive funding for international recruitment, justification for this should be clearly detailed within the grant application. Reasons for requiring international recruitment may include:
- Limited UK sites that could take part in a trial. This could be due to the requirement for certain surgical equipment, a minimum level of surgeon operating experience or trial interventions only performed by specialist centres.
- Known small participant population
Trials with international components require additional resources, which will need to be adequately covered by the trial budget. Additional costs could include:
Staff
Project management of an international trial will be more complex than if the trial only involved UK recruitment. This may therefore require more senior oversight and input to manage the set-up of international sites particularly in relation to contract negotiations and to resolve any challenges posed by recruiting on an international level. Additional staff time may be required as international set-up is more time intensive.
Additional Set-Up Time
International recruitment often will require additional set-up time in a grant as which will have a knock-on effect on overall grant costs. Time should be factored in to allow certain elements of set-up that may extend timelines e.g. contract negotiations and obtaining translations of documents.
Use of an International Spoke
There are advantages to using an international spoke/lead site for local trial co-ordination in a country or territory. Costs will depend on level of involvement in the trial, and duration of work. Responsibilities for all parties involved should be clear from the outset to ensure adequate funding is calculated and included. Trial archiving may also involve shipping of trial documents at the end of the trial to the main co-ordinating centre from international spokes/lead sites.
Insurance
Dependant on the local clinical trials insurance policy held by the host institution, additional funding may be required to put in place insurance in different countries. This should be explored early on during the grant development as costs can be high depending on the level of cover required and won’t always be covered by all funders.
Ethical Committee/Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Regulatory Agency Fees
In some territories, ethical committee/ institutional review boards/regulatory agencies charge fees for review of projects for initial approvals, amendments and ongoing yearly reviews. In some cases, it may be possible to have these fees waived e.g. a non-commercial trial. A clear understanding of local ethical review processes in each country will ensure that adequate funding for these types of fees can be included within the trial grant.
Local Research Support
Local research support can differ between sites as there may not be the same research infrastructure as the UK e.g. clinical research networks etc. If sites are responsible for obtaining local approvals, can funding be included to facilitate this? Additional funding may also be required to ensure local research support throughout the trial to ensure good compliance with the trial and subsequent data collection.
Site/Per Patient Payments
If possible, site and per-patient payments should be costed in the same way as costed for UK sites. This may mean that it is easier to obtain funding for international recruitment.
Translations
Translation of patient facing documents e.g. patient information sheets, consent form documents, cover letters etc. Costs of original translations and back translations where required. There may also be additional costs associated with obtaining validated quality of life questionnaires in the various languages required.
Postage/Shipping
This may cover postage of trial supplies to international sites, original CRFs to the co-ordinating centre, shipping of samples from sites to laboratories.
Travel
It is recommended that additional funding is included within international trials to cover site initiations, site visits and investigator meetings.
Taxes
Payments from the grant to parties outside of the UK e.g. participating sites, international spokes may be subject to different taxes to what is standard in the UK.
Monitoring
If monitoring is required, travel costs will need to be included. It may be that it is more appropriate to use a local CRO to conduct site monitoring which may significantly increase costs. It is recommended that detailed discussions are held with relevant CROs ensuring it is clear what tasks are required and timelines for these so an appropriate quote can be obtained.
It is recommended that payments to external international collaborators (e.g. research sites, spokes) are detailed in the relevant agreements and paid in the same currency as the main grant. This removes the risk of being exposed to an adverse fluctuating currency rate should this change through the lifetime of a trial. If you are required to make payments in local currency, considerations should be given to the payment schedule to minimise the risk where possible e.g. making regular payments throughout the grant rather than leaving all payments to the end of the trial.
Another option is to make the payment upfront upon signature of the agreement, however whilst this may reduce the risk of experiencing an adverse currency fluctuation, this does pose another risk in that it may be difficult to recoup any money paid if the spokes/sites do not then go onto fulfil their roles in the trial. It should be explored whether there are any local regulations that would need to be considered in relation to making payments e.g. any anti-bribery legislation
Another option is to make the payment upfront upon signature of the agreement, however whilst this may reduce the risk of experiencing an adverse currency fluctuation, this does pose another risk in that it may be difficult to recoup any money paid if the spokes/sites do not then go onto fulfil their roles in the trial. It should be explored whether there are any local regulations that would need to be considered in relation to making payments e.g. any anti-bribery legislation